home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- > > If necessary or desired, I'd be more than willing to help you out on the
- > > different aspects of the protocol and hardware access. And maybe, just
- > > maybe, we could design a protocol small enough to work on 31250 bps. I'm
- > > not the greatest of optimists on just that, though...
- >
- > Nice!
- >
- > I would also say that it should work very well on 31 Kbps.
- >
- > > By the way, when you say we need to send out a package each cycle, just
- > > how do you define cycle? Each time a specific machine is about to make
- > > another screen redraw? Each VBL (Shiver)?
- >
- > I will have to think about this.
- > We have to discuss it further. I also have to look deeper into the code.
- >
- > > One thing we might want to consider is a separate mailing list open for
- > > those who do programming on the project only - that way we could share
- > > ideas and code segments without irritating others.
- >
- > Yes, that would be nice. Who fixes that?
-
- Maybe we also should deceid who is going to coordinate the network part, or
- should everyone who wants to help out? I would think it would be easier to handle
- if one could be the head to stear the arms and leggs. ;-)
-
- BTW. Do you think you could have an beta version ready to NAS? :-) I think there
- will be quiet a few falcons there. Maybe an battle between the different demo crews.
- :-))
-
- //Magnus Kollberg
-
-